While there’s long been the stereotype that if you’re rich, you must be a Republican and the Democrats are the party of the blue-collar working class, this year’s election hinged on the opposite of that notion. The election split was not actually between red and blue states, but rather between urban and rural areas within those states.
In every major swing state, Biden blue dominated major urban areas (Detroit, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Pittsburgh, Miami, etc.), while the majority of outlying areas ran Trump red. Taking a look at this geographical split yields some interesting findings.
In a study entitled “What Unites and Divides Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities,” The Pew Research Center highlights a number of key differences. Today 35% of urban residents have a college degree compared to 19% of rural residents. Concentrated poverty — a measure in which at least of fifth of the population is poor — occurs in 31% of rural counties compared to 19% of urban counties.
The average earning (in 2016 dollars) was about $35,000 in rural counties and $50,000 in urban counties. This economic wealth gap is widening, creating not just a cultural split, but also resentment.
Demographically, rural areas are more white and aging faster. Urban areas have a greater ethnic/racial mix and more immigrants. Three-quarters of rural Republicans/leaning Republican feel immigrants threaten traditional American customs and values, while three quarters of urban Democrats/leaning Democrat feel immigrants strengthen American society.
The majority of rural residents feel whites don’t really benefit from advantages in society. Nearly 70% of urban residents disagree, saying whites benefit a fair amount to a great deal. In addition, majorities in both rural and urban areas feel their communities are looked down on and people in other types of communities don’t understand their problems.
Given this disconnect, it’s not hard to understand how resentment manifests itself in campaign vitriol. “Rich liberal elites destroying the country, focusing on being woke instead of real economic issues.” “Uneducated hicks and racists who can’t think for themselves, blindly following an idiot with no morals.”
This role reversal pitted rich Democrats against blue-collar Republicans. It was the bicoastal urban elite vs. rural middle America.
Much has been written about why Trump got so many votes (even more than in the 2016 election). But what people fail to recognize is that a large percentage of his voters are not endorsing Trump as an individual, they are making a statement of defiance.
Trump is a vehicle for dissatisfaction, an emblem for people feeling unheard and left out. Studies show that on social media, the emotions that elicit the most powerful responses are fear and anger. These emotions are Trump’s bread and butter. For many of his voters, the prospect of liberals taking over the country trumped any personal shortcomings he had (sorry for the bad pun).
So where does all this leave us? The United States is increasingly becoming a country of haves and have-nots. It’s not a question of which is the party of the rich. There are both rich and poor Democrats and Republicans. The problem is the rich are partying.
The wealthiest 10% of Americans own 84% of stocks. Nearly 100 of the Fortune 500 companies paid zero taxes in 2018. Whether it’s dressed up as Republican or Democrat, the increasing gap between rich and poor factors into virtually every political issue: perpetuating systemic racism, the rationale for health coverage, the basis of tax policy, the impetus for education reform, the list goes on and on.
Most people who live in a capitalist society accept that there will be some level of wealth inequality. But what is unacceptable is the notion of no longer being able to realize the American dream.
Wealth has become more entrenched, and it is strangling opportunity and upward mobility. College has become more elitist and expensive. Surviving on low-paying jobs has become more difficult. Owning a home is for many virtually impossible.
The U.S. has the highest level of income inequality of all industrialized nations, with over 40 million people living in poverty. Between 1980 and 2014 (the span of one generation), the income of the bottom 50% of U.S. earners (adjusted for inflation) basically stagnated while for the top 10% of earners, it increased 121% and for the top 1%, it increased 205%. The majority of America’s millennials today are worse off than their parents were at a similar age.
These are the concerns that drive political rhetoric and bring people to the polls. And while Biden (who stole from Obama) said, “I don’t see red or blue states, I see the United States,” we need to be united in better addressing the real divide in this country: the gap between the haves and the have-nots.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
"really" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 05:07PM
https://ift.tt/37nY7G7
Who's Really The Party Of The Rich? - Honolulu Civil Beat
"really" - Google News
https://ift.tt/3b3YJ3H
https://ift.tt/35qAk7d
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Who's Really The Party Of The Rich? - Honolulu Civil Beat"
Post a Comment